
[061112]
I forgot. The reason I don’t say anything about J’s work is that he never listens to me. So I’ll just keep my smartass mouth shut from now on.
Anyways, I wasn’t going to write something long and rambly, but J’s comment and another comment elsewhere in a galaxy far far away prompts yet another long rambling. Now, if you will, ignore whatever you might consider arrogance in what I’m about to say, as it is certainly not my intent.
A buddy of mine online commented as to why I didn’t think my work was well, for lack of a better term, “able to be commercialized upon”. Apparently this person holds me drawing in reasonably high regard. So how you look at a drawing depends largely on how much drawing you do and how much drawing you’re exposed to, and how you make use of the two. If I were to look at the picture in this update three years ago, I would have said the same thing as this person – that is, that the illustration is “print worthy”.
Hell, three years ago, I tried to print Starcrossed thinking the that material was “print worthy”.
I’m getting at is that in order to improve, you need to train yourself to be able to step back, take a look, and say “This is what is wrong with my drawing and this is what I need to work on”. Eventually, with each generation of work, you can see what’s wrong with the current generation, and make amends with the next generation, and so on and so forth. Being able to improve in that sense is being able to, in a sense, “enlighten” your perception.
Eventually you start seeing errors in works of yourself and of others that you previously couldn’t see, again, how “good” you are at drawing could almost be considered as “who can see the most flaws in a work”.
Well, that was actually a pretty retarded and disjointed rambling now that I think of it – but hey, something’s better than nothing.
